Stonewall

When out-gay German film director Roland Emmerich bombed The White House in ‘Independence Day’ everyone cheered (it became the first movie to take over $100 million at the Box Office in a week). However the moment he announced that his latest movie would be revisiting the Stonewall Riots that had marked the start of the gay liberation movement, there was an enormous outcry. There was even a petition by some people who were totally outraged accusing the filmmaker of re-writing a part of history that gay activists consider the holy grail and condemning this movie that no-one had actually seen yet.  The veteran gay author/activist Larry Kramer however came to Emmerich’s defense and told him ‘not to listen to the crazies’ as everyone it seems has their own unique understanding of what went on that fateful night and very little of it substantiated by any evidence as there are so few witnesses still alive and around today.

According to the account from historian David Carter, author of Stonewall: The Riots That Sparked The Gay Revolution’ then Emmerich’s take on it all is well rooted in facts.  Carter wrote “My research for this history demonstrates that if we wish to name the group most responsible for the success of the riots, it is the young, homeless homosexuals, and, contrary to the usual characterizations of those on the rebellion’s front lines, most were Caucasian; few were Latino; almost none were transvestites or transsexuals; most were effeminate; and a fair number came from middle-class families.” 

With the movie’s imminent US release there is a real danger that many in LGBT community will continue to judge it harshly simply based on the rumors rather than on it’s own merit, which is indeed a shame.  As although Emmerich’s fictional narrative is by no means a documentary on the events leading up to that fateful night in 1969 it is a strongly political based drama that will resonate with younger audiences in particular as it gives a real sense of what went down and help paved the way towards social acceptance and equality.

 
The movie is Danny’s story. When he is caught in flagrante with the quarterback of the school’s football team it is far too much for the Coach who just happens to be Danny’s father too.  Thrown out of his home, Danny hops on a Greyhound bus and leaves his small country town in Indiana and heads for the bright lights of New York.  Specifically those that are shining in Christopher Street in the West Village.  As a fresh young twink in town, Danny immediately attracts the attention of Ray a flamboyant androgynous punk who lives in the streets off his wits and a few ‘tricks’ with ‘johns’ that he scores.  For the first time in his life, Danny is amongst openly gay men and with Ray as his guide and mentor he meets a whole gang of them who are introduced to him as his ‘girlfriends’.  Each has their own colorful story to tell of how they spend their days hustling in Christopher Street and then after a night in the Bars, crashing all together in one small room in a local seedy hotel.
 

They include Queen Cong, Little Orphan Annie, Quiet Paul and Lee and they know everything that is going down on what they consider is their turf, and all the other players in the hood including the fabulous Marsha P Johnson who was  an African-American drag queen who in real life went on to be a major force in gay activism after the Stonewall riot.

Danny is totally out of his depth as his new sisters teach him how to hustle and even let a ‘john’ give him a blow job and he soon attracts the attention of an attractive older man who is an activist with the burgeoning Mattachine Group trying to promote homosexual rights in a very passive manner.  Trevor takes Danny under his wing and into his bed, but what the young man believes is ‘love’ is just lust and as quick as he moves into Trevor’s apartment he moves out when he finds that he has already been replaced by a newer younger model. Rushing back to his gang of new sisters is not easy as Ray now professes his unrequited love for him.
 
When an angry Trevor realises where Danny has fled too, he questions his judgement in making these rough street kids his friends, but as Danny is finally embracing his sexuality quips back ‘they have been better friends to me than the people who I thought were my friends my entire life’.
The picture that Emmerich paints as a background to Danny’s story covers is a seedy one : of the Mafia mob who run the Stonewall Inn and all the other gay bars which are totally illegal, and of the protection money that they regularly pay to a corrupt police force. There is the sheer brutality where gay men are beaten up not just be the police, but also ‘johns’ too and even other members of their own community.  He even has Danny kidnapped and forced to have oral sex with some very powerful authority figure with a penchant for bad drag.

The night of riots which Emmerich shows as an unexpected Police Raid  ….. they had their regular one arranged by the corrupt Precinct two nights earlier  …. was intended to finally capture the illusive bar owner, but it went all wrong and when the drag queens and lesbians were hauled to the paddy wagon to be carted off, the crowd started to fight back. (Gay guys or girls not wearing some sort of drag were always allowed to leave if they had ID). He actually combined several nights of riots into one but asides from that whether he got it factually correct or not, the scene plays out powerfully, and he captures a real essence of how scary and exhilarating the events of were, and how nothing would ever be the same again.

Stonewall works well as a coming-of-age story of this young country boy albeit even when the going gets rough and dirty Danny still looks like an Abercrombie poster boy, and although trying to get such a good cross-section of Christopher Street characters of that period, Emmerich relies a little too much on some cliched stereotypes.


For Danny there was a ‘happy ever after’ moment when a year later he takes part in the first ever Gay Pride March through New York watched by his baby sister and his previously unforgiving mother. As the credits role we learn how it finished up for others such as Seymour Pine the ‘good cop’ who later apologized for the Raids, and for Marsha P Johnson who achieved so much as an activist before she had a very tragic death.

Emmerich’s movies to date have been mainly big budget blockbusters that have grossed something like $3 billion worldwide.  To make this independent movie though he actually put his money where his mouth is and financed it himself which sits well with us.  He may not see much of that money back if the post reviews are as angry and harsh as those that surfaced before even a single frame was seen, but that would a great injustice and we are more than happy to recommend this rather engaging motion picture to those with an open mind and who are just really wanting to be entertained. 


Posted

in

by