So this is how it works: subscribers pay a monthly rate to get access to all of the content and privately message with their favorite influencers. The platform partnered with high-profile LGBTQ+ creators such as athletes, travel couples, and models to help launch the app. Soon after, plenty of gays started uploading sexy content to their own Ultraviolet Club page with a price tag attached. That may sound exactly the same as OnlyFans, but the newcomer has some very distinct differences This is where some of you may stop reading any further, as Ultraviolet Club doesn’t allow nudity or pornography on its platform. To comply with strict Apple and Google guidelines, the site strictly moderates against explicit, hard-core pornography, and advertises itself as a “provocative lifestyle, fitness, and intimate chatting” app.
Ultraviolet Club is actually selective with who they allow on the platform, and at first glance they have a significant female presence. Creators must submit an application and have at least 10,000 followers to join the site. OnlyFans, on the other hand, uses an open-door policy, so anyone over 18 can create an account and begin selling content. Ultraviolet Club also encourages more direct chats between influencers and subscribers via DM or even video calls, whereas OnlyFans is curated as more of a social media feed.
Ultraviolet Club claims that its creators get paid much quicker, as the platform includes instant financial payouts. Whereas OnlyFans imposes standard holding periods (ranging from 7 to 21 days) before earnings can be legally withdrawn to a bank account. However, the earnings on each site are basically the same.
Both platforms take a 20% base commission from gross fan payments, meaning creators keep 80% of their earnings. The only slight difference is OnlyFans includes credit card fees in their cut, but Ultraviolet Club charges their platform tax after transactional fees. Essentially, Ultraviolet Club models might make a little less than 80% after credit card fees are applied
Leave a Reply