Beatriz At Dinner

 

For much of its plot, the dramatic comedy Beatriz at Dinner, teeters between becoming a cliched ridden tale about a Trumpesque property baron and a Buddhist Holistic healer, or a powerful take on a very contemporary environmental scenario. What pushes it more to the latter are the potent performances of is two stars Salam Hayek and John Lithgow who actually reveal a depth beyond what the script may have called for.

Beatriz (Hayek) is somewhat of a sad soul who lives in a small ramshackle L.A. house with her dogs and goats and divides her time working at the Arendale Cancer Center, an alternative-medicine facility and her private practice. When she finishes most of her working day, Beatriz drives her old Volkswagen up to the palatial seaside mansion of one of her clients, Cathy (Connie Britton), whose teenage daughter she helped to care for when the girl was recovering from chemo. 

Cathy has a had a ‘stressful day’ organizing a dinner party that her private chef has prepared for a intimate business dinner party her husband Grant (David Warshofsky) is throwing to honor Doug Strutt (Lithgow) a ruthless tycoon who has also been the source for much of their own success. After Beatriz has finished massaging Cathy, she discovers that her old Volkswagen has finally died and as she needs to wait for her to drive out to help her, Cathy insists that she Beatriz stay  for dinner. It is not a invitation that Grant is keen to endorse as he regards Beatriz as staff, but Cathy insists as she was the main reason that their teenage daughter have survived all her chemotherapy treatments after she had been diagnosed wth cancer.

When the guests arrive  dressed in their finery there is an awkwardness at introducing Beatriz still in her working clothes, and at one point, Strutt mistaking her as staff, asks her to refresh his drink.  A nervous Beatriz starts drinking too which emboldens her to speak her mind when she discovers that every time Strutt builds a new mega-hotel he inevitably destroys the local environment and economy too. It’s a set up for an obvious pending row between two strongly held opposing views which is uncomfortable witnessed by the hosts and the two other guests.

The film reunites writer Mike White with director Miquel Arteta (they did ‘Chuck & Buck‘ and ‘The Good Girl‘ together) and they give the film a neat and unexpected ending which helps redeem it from being a conventional bad guys destroying our planet versus the devoted activists determined to save it that it was in grave danger of becoming.

 


Posted

in

by